To be completed:
***
Reminder: Not medical advice, consult doctor before, etc.
Fear, frustration with lack of control (Zen and the Art of Making a Living)
Seven A’s of Healing (Gabor – When the Body Says No)
Mental Health Basics and Neurotransmitters
Current broken (Westernized cause and effect/diagnostic) mental health system
Why we feel like this:
Note on pharmaceuticals (link to pharma page)
***
For those habituated to high levels of internal stress since early childhood, it is the absence of stress that creates unease, evoking boredom and a sense of meaninglessness. People may become addicted to their own stress hormones, adrenaline and cortisol, Hans Selye observed. To such persons, stress feels desirable, while the absence of it feels like something to be avoided.
Stress consists of the internal alterations that occur when the organism perceives a threat to its existence or well-being. While nervous tension may be a component of stress, one can be stressed without feeling tension. On the other hand, it is possible to feel tension without activating the physiological mechanisms of stress.
Excessive stress occurs when the demands made on an organism exceed that organism’s reasonable capacities to fulfill them. The stress response can be set off by physical damage, either infection or injury. It can also be triggered by emotional trauma or the threat of it.
Excessive acid production due to stress and disordered neural input from the autonomic nervous system play a role in reflux.
The experience of stress has three components:
Selye discovered that the biology of stress predominantly affected the adrenal glands, the spleen, the thymus and lymph glands, and the intestinal lining.
On the perception of a threat, the hypothalamus in the brain stem releases corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), which travels a short distance to the pituitary. Stimulated by CRH, the pituitary releases adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH).
ACTH is in turn carried by the blood to the adrenals. Here ACTH acts on the adrenal cortex. Stimulated by ACTH, this gland now secretes the corticoid hormones, the chief among them being cortisol.
Cortisol acts on almost every tissue in the body one way or another—from the brain to the immune system, from the bones to the intestines. The immediate effects of cortisol are to dampen the stress reaction, decreasing immune activity to keep it within safe bounds.
Selye’s triad of adrenal enlargement, lymphoid tissue shrinkage and intestinal ulcerations are due, then, to the enhancing effect of ACTH on the adrenal, the inhibiting effect of cortisol on the immune system and the ulcerating effect of cortisol on the intestines.
To facilitate fight or flight, blood needs to be diverted from the internal organs to the muscles, and the heart needs to pump faster. The brain needs to focus on the threat, forgetting about hunger or sexual drive. Stored energy supplies need to be mobilized, in the form of sugar molecules. The immune cells must be activated. Adrenaline, cortisol and the other stress substances fulfill those tasks.
All stressors represent the absence of something that the organism perceives as necessary for survival—or its threatened loss. The threatened loss of food supply is a major stressor and for humans there is also the threatened loss of love.
Three factors universally lead to stress:
All three are present in the lives of individuals with chronic illness. For some people, it is disease that finally shatters the illusion of control.
Stress responses, triggered chronically and without resolution, produce harm and even permanent damage. Chronically high cortisol levels destroy tissue. Chronically elevated adrenalin levels raise the blood pressure and damage the heart.
Emotion III: Subjective experience from within oneself.
Emotion II: Emotional displays as seen by others. Nonverbal signals.
Emotion I: Physiological changes triggered by emotional stimuli, such as nervous system discharges, hormonal output, and immune changes that make up fight or flight reaction. Not under conscious control or externally visible.
Emotional competence requires:
Stress occurs in the absence of these criteria, and it leads to the disruption of homeostasis. Chronic disruption results in ill health.
Genes alone cannot possibly account for the complex psychological characteristics, the behaviors, health or illness of human beings. Genes are merely codes. They act as a set of rules and as a biological template for the synthesis of the proteins that give each particular cell its characteristic structure and functions. They are, as it were, alive and dynamic architectural and mechanical plans. Whether the plan becomes realized depends on far more than the gene itself. Genes exist and function in the context of living organisms. The activities of cells are defined not simply by the genes in their nuclei but by the requirements of the entire organism—and by the interaction of that organism with the environment in which it must survive. Genes are turned on or off by the environment.
If “science” enables us to ignore poverty or man-made toxins or a frenetic and stressful social culture as contributors to disease, we can look only to simple answers: pharmacological and biological. Such an approach helps to justify and preserve prevailing social values and structures. It may also be profitable.
The milieu of the individual cell is the cell’s immediate surroundings, from which it receives messenger substances that originate in nearby cells, in nerve endings controlled from afar and in distant organs that secrete chemicals into the circulatory system. The information substances attach to receptors on the cell surface. Then, in the cell membrane—depending on how receptive the cell is at that moment—effector substances are produced that go to the nucleus, instructing genes to synthesize particular proteins to carry out specific functions. These receptor-effector protein complexes are called perception proteins. They act as switches that integrate the function of the cell with its environment.
When early environmental influences are chronically stressful, the developing nervous system and the other organs of the PNI super-system repeatedly receive the electric, hormonal and chemical message that the world is unsafe or even hostile. Those perceptions are programmed in our cells on the molecular level. Early experiences condition the body’s stance toward the world and determine the person’s unconscious beliefs about herself in relationship to the world. Dr. Lipton calls that process the biology of belief.
1. I Have to be Strong
The core belief in having to be strong enough, characteristic of many people who develop chronic illness, is a defense. The child who perceives that her parents cannot support her emotionally had better develop an attitude of “I can handle everything myself.” Otherwise, she may feel rejected. One way not to feel rejected is never to ask for help, never to admit “weakness”—to believe that I am strong enough to withstand all my vicissitudes alone.
2. It’s Not Right for me to be Angry
Emotional distancing as a means of survival.
3. If I’m Angry, I Will Not be Lovable
The desire to be liked often makes one repress anger because it’s believed that people don’t like angry people.
4. I’m Responsible for the Whole World
Conflict is believed to be an indicator of a bad relationship so it is avoided and the sufferer sucks it up, taking responsibility for the other. A failure to acknowledge vulnerability and obsession with perfectionism. It helps to say, “I should be a guide, not a god.”
The person in this example associated his clients’ failure as his own. Meaning he had to work harder, learn more, and go to more workshops.
5. I Can Handle Anything
Taking pride in being able to handle obscene workloads.
6. I’m Not Wanted – I’m Not Lovable
7. I Don’t Exist Unless I do Something. I Must Justify My Existence
8. I Have to be Very Ill to Deserve Being Taken Care Of
Accepting punishing roles in life until sickness rescues them from it.
Whichever modality of treatment people choose—conventional medicine with or without complementary healing; alternative approaches like energy medicine or various mind-body techniques; ancient Eastern practices like Ayurvedic medicine or yoga or Chinese acupuncture; the universal practice of meditation techniques; psychotherapy; nutritional healing—the key to healing is the individual’s active, free and informed choice.
No disease has a single cause. Even where significant risks can be identified—such as biological heredity in some autoimmune diseases or smoking in lung cancer—these vulnerabilities do not exist in isolation. Personality also does not by itself cause disease: one does not get cancer simply from repressing anger or ALS just from being too nice. A systems model recognizes that many processes and factors work together in the formation of disease or in the creation of health.
Disease is disharmony. It is an expression of an internal disharmony. If illness is seen as foreign and external, we may end up waging war against ourselves.
As soon as we qualify the word thinking with the adjective positive, we exclude those parts of reality that strike us as “negative.” That is how most people who espouse positive thinking seem to operate. Genuine positive thinking begins by including all our reality. It is guided by the confidence that we can trust ourselves to face the full truth, whatever that full truth may turn out to be.
Negative thinking is not a doleful, pessimistic view that masquerades as “realism.” Rather, it is a willingness to consider what is not working. What is not in balance? What have I ignored? What is my body saying no to? Without these questions, the stresses responsible for our lack of balance will remain hidden.
One cannot be autonomous as long as one is driven by relationship dynamics, by guilt or attachment needs, by hunger for success, by the fear of the boss or by the fear of boredom. The reason is simple: autonomy is impossible as long as one is driven by anything.
While it is true that genuine joy and satisfaction enhance physical well-being, “positive” states of mind generated to tune out psychic discomfort lower resistance to illness.
Emotional scars are most often invisible. But scars of any type are less strong and less resilient than the tissue they replace: they remain potential sites of future pain and disruption, unless they are recognized and tended to.
Tuning out by daydreaming, for example, enables the child to endure experiences that otherwise may trigger reactions that would land him in trouble. This kind of dissociation is in play when a person retains conscious recall for events in the past but not for their traumatic emotional resonance. It explains many “happy childhoods.”
If an infant is uncomfortable or unhappy, she’ll cry, show sadness, show anger. Anything that we do to hide pain or sadness is an acquired response. It may make sense to hide negative emotion in some circumstances, but so many of us do it all the time, and we do it automatically.
Developing the courage to think negatively allows us to look at ourselves as we really are.
There is a remarkable consistency in people’s coping styles across the many diseases they have considered:
Emotionally draining family relationships have been identified as risk factors in virtually every category of major illness, from degenerative neurological conditions to cancer and autoimmune disease. The purpose is not to blame parents or previous generations or spouses but to enable us to discard beliefs that have proved dangerous to our health.
“The power of negative thinking” requires the removal of rose-colored glasses. Not blame of others but owning responsibility for one’s relationships is the key.
The power of negative thinking requires the strength to accept that we are not as strong as we would like to believe. Our insistently strong self-image was generated to hide a weakness—the relative weakness of the child. Our fragility is nothing to be ashamed of. A person can be strong and still need help, can be powerful in some areas of life and helpless and confused in others. We cannot do all that we thought we could.
If a refusal saddles you with guilt, while consent leaves resentment in its wake, opt for the guilt. Resentment is soul suicide.
Negative thinking allows us to gaze unflinchingly on our own behalf at what does not work. We have seen in study after study that compulsive positive thinkers are more likely to develop disease and less likely to survive. Genuine positive thinking—or, more deeply, positive being—empowers us to know that we have nothing to fear from truth.
Although it accounts for only 1% of all cancers, malignant melanoma provides for 11% of spontaneous cancer remissions.
Emotional competence is the capacity that enables us to stand in a responsible, non-victimized, and non-self-harming relationship with our environment. It is the required internal ground for facing life’s inevitable stresses, for avoiding the creation of unnecessary ones and for furthering the healing process. Pursuing the seven A’s of healing will help us grow into emotional competence.
1. Acceptance
The willingness to recognize and accept how things are. It is the courage to permit negative thinking to inform our understanding, without allowing it to define our approach to the future.
It challenges the deeply held belief that we are not worthy enough or “good” enough to be whole. Acceptance also implies a compassionate relationship with oneself. It means discarding the double standard that, as we have seen, too often characterizes our relationship with the world.
“You can’t force yourself to say no anymore than you can force someone else to say no, but you can be compassionate toward yourself.”
Compassionate curiosity about the self does not mean liking everything we find out about ourselves, only that we look at ourselves with the same non-judgmental acceptance we would wish to accord anyone else who suffered and who needed help.
2. Awareness
All those seeking to heal—or to remain healthy—need to reclaim the lost capacity for emotional truth-recognition.
Animals and young humans are highly competent at picking up on real emotional cues. If we lose that capacity as we acquire language, it is only because we receive confusing messages from our immediate world. The words we hear tell us one thing, the emotional data say something different. If the two are in conflict, one will be repressed.
We repress our emotional intelligence in order to avoid an ongoing war with the crucial people in our lives, a war we cannot possibly win. And so, we lose our emotional competence even as we gain verbal intelligence. Aphasiacs, it would appear, go through the reverse process. Much as a blind person will develop an extraordinary capacity to hear, the aphasiac develops an enhanced ability to perceive emotional reality.
Full awareness would mean that we would regain our lost capacity to perceive emotional reality and that we are ready to let go of the paralyzing belief that we are not strong enough to face the truth about our lives.
To develop awareness we have to practice, pay constant attention to our internal states and learn to trust these internal perceptions more than what words—our own or anyone else’s—convey. What is the tone of voice? The pitch? Do the eyes narrow or open? Is the smile relaxed or tight? How do we feel? Where do we feel it?
Awareness also means learning what the signs of stress are in our own bodies, how our bodies telegraph us when our minds have missed the cues.
3. Anger
Not only does the repression of anger predispose to disease but the experience of anger has been shown to promote healing or, at least, to prolong survival. People with cancer who have been able to muster anger at their physicians, for example, have lived longer than their more placid counterparts.
However, not only is the unbridled outpouring of anger harmful to the recipients or bystanders but it can also be deadly to the one who rages. Heart attacks can follow upon outbursts of rage. In general, high blood pressure and heart disease are more likely to happen in persons who harbor hostility.
If in repression the problem is a lack of release, acting out consists of an equally abnormal suppression of release alternating with unregulated and exaggerated venting.
Healthy anger, Allen Kaplin says, is an empowerment and a relaxation. The real experience of anger “is physiologic experience without acting out. The experience is one of a surge of power going through the system, along with a mobilization to attack. There is, simultaneously, a complete disappearance of all anxiety.
Acting out through bursts of rage is a defense against the anxiety that invariably accompanies anger in a child. Anger triggers anxiety because it coexists with positive feelings, with love and the desire for contact. But since anger leads to an attacking energy, it threatens attachment. Thus, there is something basically anxiety provoking about the anger experience, even without external, parental injunctions against anger expression.
Naturally, the more parents discourage or forbid the experience of anger, the more anxiety-producing that experience will be for the child. In all cases where anger is completely repressed or where chronic repression alternates with explosive eruptions of rage, the early childhood history was one in which the parents were unable to accept the child’s natural anger.
The anxiety of anger and other “negative” emotions like sadness and rejection may become deeply bound in the body. Eventually it is transmuted into biological changes through the multiple and infinitely subtle cross-connections of the PNI apparatus, the unifying nexus of body/mind. This is the route that leads to organic disease. When anger is disarmed, so is the immune system. Or when the aggressive energy of anger is diverted inward, the immune system becomes confused. Our physiological defenses no longer protect us or may even turn mutinous, attacking the body.
People diagnosed with cancer or with autoimmune disease, with chronic fatigue or fibromyalgia, or with potentially debilitating neurological conditions, are often enjoined to relax, to think positively, to lower their stress levels. All that is good advice, but impossible to carry out if one of the major sources of stress is not clearly identified and dealt with: the internalization of anger.
Anger does not require hostile acting out. First and foremost, it is a physiological process to be experienced. Second, it has cognitive value—it provides essential information. Since anger does not exist in a vacuum, if I feel anger, it must be in response to some perception on my part. It may be a response to loss or the threat of it in a personal relationship, or it may signal a real or threatened invasion of my boundaries. I am greatly empowered without harming anyone if I permit myself to experience the anger and to contemplate what may have triggered it. Depending on circumstances, I may choose to manifest the anger in some way or to let go of it. The key is that I have not suppressed the experience of it. I may choose to display my anger as necessary in words or in deeds, but I do not need to act it out in a driven fashion as uncontrolled rage. Healthy anger leaves the individual, not the unbridled emotion, in charge.
“Anger is the energy Mother Nature gives us as little kids to stand forward on our own behalf and say I matter,” says the therapist Joann Peterson, who conducts workshops on Gabriola Island, in British Columbia. “The difference between the healthy energy of anger and the hurtful energy of emotional and physical violence is that anger respects boundaries. Standing forward on your own behalf does not invade anyone else’s boundaries.”
4. Autonomy
Mind and spirit can survive grievous physical injury, but time and again we see that the physical body begins to succumb when psychic integrity and freedom are jeopardized.
When we look at the research that predicts who is likely to become ill, we find that the people at greatest risk are those who experienced the most severe boundary invasions before they were able to construct an autonomous sense of self.
Childhood stressors such as emotional or sexual abuse, violence, drug use or mental illness in the family were correlated with adult risk behaviors, health outcomes and death. There was a “strong graded relationship” between dysfunction in the family of origin and adult health status—that is, the greater the exposure to dysfunction had been in childhood, the worse the health status was in the adult and the greater were the chances of untimely death from cancer, heart disease, injury or other causes.
Most commonly in the lives of children, boundaries are not so much violated as simply not constructed in the first place. Many parents cannot help their child develop boundaries because they themselves were never enabled to do so in their own formative years. We can only do what we know.
Enmeshment—what Dr. Michael Kerr called a lack of differentiation—comes to dominate one’s intimate relationships. It can take two forms, withdrawal and sullen and self-defeating resistance to authority.
Since the immune confusion that leads to disease reflects a failure to distinguish self from non-self, healing has to involve establishing or reclaiming the boundaries of an autonomous self.
Dr. Peterson (Anger, Boundaries, and Safety): “Boundaries are invisible, the result of a conscious, internal felt sense defining who I am. Asking yourself, ‘In my life and relationships, what do I desire, want more of, or less of, or what don’t I want, what are my stated limits?’ begins the process…. In this self-definition, we define what we value and want in life at this particular time from a place of internal self-reference; the locus of control is from inside ourselves.”
Autonomy, then, is the development of that internal center of control.
5. Attachment
In the earliest attachment relationships, we gain or lose the ability to stay open, self-nurturing and healthy. In those early attachment bonds, we learned to experience anger or to fear it and repress it. There we developed our sense of autonomy or suffered its atrophy. Connection is also vital to healing. Study after study concludes that people without social contact—the lonely ones—are at greatest risk for illness. People who enjoy genuine emotional support face a better prognosis, no matter what the disease.
We sometimes find it easier to feel bitterness or rage than to allow ourselves to experience that aching desire for contact that, when disappointed, originally engendered the anger. Behind all our anger lies a deeply frustrated need for truly intimate contact. Healing both requires and implies regaining the vulnerability that made us shut down emotionally in the first place. We are no longer helplessly dependent children; we no longer need fear emotional vulnerability. We can permit ourselves to honor the universally reciprocal human need for connection and to challenge the ingrained belief that unconsciously burdens so many people with chronic illness: that we are not lovable. Seeking connections is a necessity for healing.
6. Assertion
Beyond acceptance and awareness, beyond the experience of anger and the unfolding of autonomy, along with the celebration of our capacity for attachment and the conscious search for contact, comes assertion: it is the declaration to ourselves and to the world that we are and that we are who we are.
In our fear we falsely equate reality with tumult, being with activity, meaning with achievement. We think autonomy and freedom mean the liberty to do, to act or react as we wish. Assertion in the sense of self-declaration is deeper than the limited autonomy of action. It is the statement of our being, a positive valuation of ourselves independent of our history, personality, abilities or the world’s perceptions of us. Assertion challenges the core belief that we must somehow justify our existence.
It demands neither acting nor reacting. It is being, irrespective of action. Thus, assertion may be the very opposite of action, not only in the narrow sense of refusing to do something we do not wish to do but letting go of the very need to act.
7. Affirmation
When we affirm, we make a positive statement; we move toward something of value. There are two basic values that can assist us to heal and to remain whole, if we honor them.
Health rests on three pillars: the body, the psyche and the spiritual connection. To ignore any one of them is to invite imbalance and dis-ease.
A serotonin deficit could compromise synaptic transmission and lead to:
The most common neurotransmitters are:
Neurotransmitter Dominance
A genetic predisposition for higher levels of certain neurotransmitters (www.bravermantest.com).:
The blood brain barrier prevents neurotransmitters from crossing (supplemental GABA might be able to). The vagus nerve serves as a primary communication nerve between the gut and brain and can be stimulated and inhibited by neurotransmitters.
Serotonin regulates gut motility. IBS-D is characterized by excessive gut motility and diarrhea, and is modulated by serotonin levels in the gut. 46% of IBS patients exhibit depression, 34% exhibit generalized anxiety disorder, 31% panic disorder, 26% somatization. While neurotransmitter levels in the brain and gut are separate, they still seem to influence each other.
Testing Your Neurotransmitters
Your physician can test it by measuring neurotransmitter (NT) levels in your blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine. Including glutamate, norepinephrine, and epinephrine (last two are used to synthesize dopamine). Unfortunately, these tests are not measuring synaptic levels and there is no established relationship between the amount of neurotransmitters in the brain and other places in the body (due to the blood brain barrier filtering levels). NTs are made in the brain, around the body, and by bacteria.
The DUTCH Complete panel looks for markers such as homovanillate (HVA), a metabolite of dopamine metabolism, and vanilmandelate (VMA), a metabolite of norepinephrine and epinephrine metabolism. Low HVA can be due to low dopamine or poor conversion of dopamine to HVA, often caused by insufficient levels of methyl groups, magnesium, and NAD, which are needed to metabolize dopamine (addictions, cravings, pleasure seeking, sleepiness, impulsivity, tremors, low motivation, fatigue, and low mood). Low VMA in the urine may indicate low adrenal hormone output and often a signal of low copper of vitamin C (addictions, craving, fatigue, low blood pressure, low muscle tone, exercise intolerance, depression, and loss of alertness).
Neurotransmitter quizzes:
Do You Have a Leaky Brain?
You can get a blood panel from Cyrex laboratories (BBB permeability test) that looks for antibodies often associated with BBB issues brought on by traumatic brain injury or concussion, with the permission of a doctor. Or you could assess the following:
Poor sleep:
Excessive alcohol intake:
High blood pressure:
Other factors: